dc.contributor.author |
Esparza-Reig, Javier |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Guillén Riquelme, Alejandro |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Martí Vilar, Manuel |
|
dc.contributor.author |
González Sala, Francisco |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-29T14:47:58Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-29T14:47:58Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10550/83544 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background: The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) is one of the most widely used screening instruments for evaluating addiction to gambling. Method: The main objective of this study is to analyze whether the SOGS is a reliable instrument and what characteristics of studies on the SOGS are linked to its reported reliability. Results: A meta-analysis was carried out with 63 studies including 65 independent samples. The mean value of a was .86 (95% CI of .84-.88), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.27%). The variables that explain the most heterogeneity were the continent where the study was performed (R2 = .61), application to participants with or without clinical problems (R2 = .58), the form of administration of the questionnaire (R2 = .56), and the standard deviation in the SOGS score (R2 = .13). Conclusions: The results show that the SOGS is a reliable instrument for evaluating gambling addiction. However, the meta-analysis highlights the need to report the reliability values for each empirical study and to provide a set of recommendations for researchers and professionals who use this instrument |
|
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Psicothema, 2021, vol. 33, num. 3, p. 490-499 |
|
dc.source |
Esparza-Reig, Javier Guillén Riquelme, Alejandro Martí Vilar, Manuel González Sala, Francisco 2021 A Reliability generalization Meta-analysis of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS). Psicothema 33 3 490 499 |
|
dc.subject |
Psicologia |
|
dc.title |
A Reliability generalization Meta-analysis of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS). |
|
dc.type |
journal article |
es_ES |
dc.date.updated |
2022-07-29T14:47:58Z |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.449 |
|
dc.identifier.idgrec |
147987 |
|
dc.rights.accessRights |
open access |
es_ES |